I don’t know, but I’m pretty sure you’ve had a busy week, between getting used to having your kids in school or planning what to do on this long holiday weekend.
Sorry for the folks in “sunny Florida” with plans ruined while dealing with Tropical Storm Gordon. (But you’re welcome for this souvenir to help you remember the occasion.)
I’ve been doing a lot of reading, besides taking my Google IT Support Professional Certificate class on Coursera, so I haven’t been able to share them on this blog like I should. I say “should” because they follow-up on issues I’ve raised here and you deserve a resolution to what you read here. Often, I put information on social media (my Twitter feed @feedbaylenny is on this page), or in the comments section of blog posts, but it’s only right to follow through in the format you saw it, and update the original. Unfortunately, most media don’t do so.
There may be a lot but it’ll go by quickly.
I’ll start with Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai being cleared by his agency’s own inspector general. Reuters reported the Donald Trump appointee was under investigation to determine whether he was unfairly biased in favor of the Sinclair Broadcast Group-Tribune Media merger.Â Just weeks before the deal was announced, Pai raised suspicion by bringing back a rule — the UHF discount — that would’ve helped the largest U.S. television broadcast group stay within national ownership limits. But the inspector general said in his report there was
“no evidence, nor even the suggestion, of impropriety, unscrupulous behavior, favoritism toward Sinclair, or lack of impartiality related to the proposed Sinclair-Tribune merger.”
Of course, the deal never happened since the FCC eventually questioned Sinclair’s candor over necessary sale of some stations. Tribune backed out and sued Sinclair for $1 billion for alleged breach of contract. According to Reuters, Tribune said Sinclair
“mishandled efforts to get the transaction approved by taking too long and being too aggressive in its dealings with regulators.”
Now, Sinclair is countersuing.
“In Delaware Court of Chancery, Sinclair rejected Tribune’s allegations and suggested the companies had been very close to winning U.S. Department of Justice approval.”
It accused Tribune of pursuing a
“deliberate effort to exploit and capitalize on an unfavorable and unexpected reaction from the FCC to capture a windfall.” Tribune called Sinclair’s counterclaim “entirely meritless” and “an attempt to distract from its own significant legal exposure.”
Do you have access to the internet? Of course you do, since you’re reading this. (OK, maybe you’re reading a friend’s printout of this post.) Regardless, in December, the FCC under Ajit Pai repealed many net neutrality rules passed in 2015 during the Obama administration. Think of it as price up or speed down. Those internet service providers (ISPs) you love to hate, according to Variety, had been banned from
“blocking or throttling traffic, or from selling ‘fast lanes’ so websites and other types of content can gain speedier access to consumers.”
But luckily, denying all Americans equal access to a free and open internet got very controversial. Friday, California lawmakers passed a bill what Variety called â€œthe strongest government-mandated protections in the countryâ€ and itâ€™s now on Gov. Jerry Brownâ€™s desk. Brown hasnâ€™t said whether heâ€™ll sign it. But the FCC â€™s repeal forbids states from passing their ownÂ net neutralityÂ rules. If Gov. Brown signs Californiaâ€™s bill, this could go to court. Pai, a former Verizon lawyer (think Fios), claims net neutrality stifled investment and burdened ISPs with regulation. Since June, ISPs have been able to make changes as long as theyâ€™re disclosed. So far, Reuters reports major providers have made no changes in internet access.
Hereâ€™s more controversy from the FCC, and something I hadnâ€™t written about before. This time, the agency is accused of lying to its watchdog, Congress, and it involves a TV comedian. More than a year ago, during the height of the net neutrality debate, the FCC claimed its â€œcomment filing system was subjected to a cyberattack,â€ according to The Verge. On May 7, 2017, our old friend John Oliver, who I’ve shown on this blog several times, asked Last Week Tonight â€œviewers to leave pro-net neutrality comments on the commissionâ€™s â€˜Restoring Internet Freedomâ€™ proceeding.â€ Oliver encouraged them
“to flood the FCC’s website with the use of memorable links like gofccyourself.com and justtellmeifimrelatedtoanazi.com. That night, the FCC’s filing system crashed.”
LANGUAGE: Viewer discretion advised.
The next morning, senior officials concluded, according to emails uncovered by theÂ inspector general, â€œsome external folks attempted to send high traffic in an attempt to tie-up the server.â€ Of course, the site was shut down by a surge of valid complaints. Several people disputed the unsubstantiatedÂ fabricated traffic claim in emails, but the DDoS theory was passed on to commissioners, like Pai, who told members of Congress (Fake News Alert!) what happened that evening was â€œclassified as a non-traditional DDoS attack.â€ Now, the agencyâ€™s inspector general is reporting
â€œthere was no distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack, and this relaying of false information to Congress prompted a deeper investigation into whether senior officials at the FCC had broken the law.â€
Turns out, an Oliver producer gave the FCC a â€œheads upâ€ days before running the episode but it never responded, and the commission knew Oliverâ€™s show had the power to move enough viewers to crash their system! According to that busy inspector generalâ€™s report, â€œWe learned very quickly there was no analysis supporting the conclusionâ€ that it was a DDoS attack. Thatâ€™s when FCC officials started being investigated for allegedly breaking the law by providing false information to Congress. But the Justice DepartmentÂ decided not to prosecute.
We knew Facebook has been on the hot seat with Americans angry aboutÂ how it handled 50 million usersâ€™ peopleâ€™s data,Â as far back as March, but President Trump was more concerned about Amazon. Then, days later, I reported, â€œâ€˜Vice President Mike Pence is concerned about Facebook and Google,â€™ according to a source. He argues those companies are dangerously powerful, and is worried about their influence on media coverage, as well as their control of the advertising industry and usersâ€™ personal info.â€ It looks like the Pence position is winning. Trump spent the week tweeting about fake news and according to Axios, attacked Google â€œfor allegedly silencing conservative voices.â€
Ars Technica reported that on Wednesday, TrumpÂ tweetedÂ this
â€œvideo that claimed, incorrectly, that Google did not feature his first speech to Congress as president.â€
(Hit the play button.)
It also reported Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah)Â wrote a formal letter to the Federal Trade Commission, released Thursday, asking it to â€œreconsider the competitive effects of Google’s conduct in search and digital advertising.â€ But it wasnâ€™t just Google for Trump.
Politico quoted him as saying,
â€œI think what Google and what others are doing, if you look at what is going on with Twitter and if you look at whatâ€™s going on in Facebook, they better be careful because you canâ€™t do that to people. â€¦I think that Google and Twitter and Facebook, they are really treading on very, very troubled territory and they have to be careful.â€
And as you just read, the president also claimed NBC Nightly News anchor â€œLester Holt got caught fudgingâ€ his tape on Russia, but the peacock network fought back andÂ posted the videoÂ of Trump’s extended, unedited interview with Holt last year.
No wonder he hates the media!
Of course, I wonâ€™t completely defend the news media from allegations of dumbing down and doing anything for profit in too many cases.Â But Iâ€™d love to see some of these disagreements fought out in open court. I donâ€™t care who sues who. I just want the evidence presented so the truth becomes obvious to everyone.
Also, I want to know why all Lenny Cohen searches show Leonard Cohen the musician instead of me!
As for the big tech companies, Yahoo! Finance reports,
â€œWednesday morning, theÂ Senate Intelligence CommitteeÂ will question Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg onÂ their responses to foreign disinformation campaigns. The committee also invited Google CEO Sundar Pichai, butÂ he declined to testify â€”Â another Google representative will testify in his place.
â€œWednesday afternoon, theÂ House Energy & Commerce CommitteeÂ will quiz Dorsey on Twitterâ€™sÂ â€˜algorithms and content monitoring.â€™â€
NBC News has reported Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced changes to the platformâ€™s news feed product since the data issue March, with â€œmore posts from friends and familyâ€ and â€œless public content, including videos and other posts from publishers or businesses.â€ Now, NBC continues,
â€œThe goal was to make Facebook more social with fewer commercial and product posts. Publishers ranging from big businesses to mommy bloggers are forced to post more content that they create personally, rather than sharing products or affiliate links.
â€œWith these changes, some small publishers claim to see a massive downside.â€
What I want to know is why in July, Zuckerberg decided Facebook would not ban Holocaust deniers!
â€œZuckerberg, who is Jewish, said he found Holocaust deniers â€˜deeply offensive.â€™ Then he said, â€˜but at the end of the day, I donâ€™t believe that our platform should take that down because I think there are things that different people get wrongâ€”I donâ€™t think that theyâ€™re intentionally getting it wrong. Itâ€™s hard to impugn intent and to understand the intent.â€™â€
So Holocaust deniers are simply uninformed? Are you kidding me, Mark? I wouldâ€™ve hoped Sandberg, who grew up in North Miami Beach, whose brother David was my high school class valedictorian, wouldâ€™ve set him straight. The Times of Israel reports Sandberg â€œsaid in an interview last year that, as a tech company, Facebook hires engineers â€” not reporters and journalists.â€ Personally, I find this would be one fight losing my job over. There has to be a line somewhere. Go far enough and youâ€™re â€œjust following ordersâ€ and we know what made that phrase so well known.
Zuckerberg later clarified in an email,
â€œI personally find Holocaust denial deeply offensive, and I absolutely didnâ€™t intend to defend the intent of people who deny that.â€ Then, he â€œreiterated a distinction he tried to draw in the interview: Posts that advocate violence will be taken down, but those that peddle misinformation will stay but â€˜would lose the vast majority of its distribution in News Feed.â€™â€
Sounds like he has lost the vast majority of his mind!
Also coming up this shortened Labor Day week, Morning Brew reports Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) will â€œintroduce a billÂ requiring major employersâ€”like Amazon, Walmart, and McDonald’sâ€”to cover the cost of government assistance programs its workers rely on…programs like food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and more.â€ For years, there has been criticismÂ years about the way Amazon pays and treats workers at its warehouses. According to The Washington Post, the Democratic Socialist said his goal
â€œis to force corporations to pay a living wage and curb aboutÂ $150 billionÂ in taxpayer dollars that go to funding federal assistance programs for low-wage workers each year. The bill â€¦ would impose a 100 percent tax on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees. For example, if an Amazon employee receives $300 in food stamps, Amazon would be taxed $300.â€
Keep in mind, Amazon owner Jeff Bezos (another who spent years in Miami) also owns The Washington Post!
Two last things: The cemetery near Detroit finally fixed my grandfather’s grave. In June, it took hours to find the marker since it was buried under inches of dirt. Now, it has been raised and leveled.
And this weekend is the 3?th anniversary of my bar mitzvah. The party had an animal theme, of course, and all the kids got t-shirts like this. (Yes, I’m keeping the specific year as evergreen as the narrator says on that Philadelphia show The Goldbergs on purpose, even though there are readers who were there!)
So that’s about it. All the original pages I found have been updated.
Before I go, I also have to thank every one of you for more than 16,800 page views on this site! The numbers have risen exponentially recently, and I wonder why. Please let me know if there’s anything I should be doing more here.
Leave your comments in the section below, and don’t miss out. If you like what you read here, subscribe to CohenConnect.com with either your email address or WordPress account, and get a notice whenever I publish. I’m also available for writing/web contract work.