Would you want Mueller’s words about Trump said about you?

by Lenny Cohen | Posted on

Wednesday, special counsel Robert Mueller spoke out for the first time, saying he was resigning and closing down the special counsel’s office.

His investigation, overseen by the Justice Department, lasted two years and led to 199 criminal charges and 37 indictments.

He submitted his 448-page final report more than two months ago and made clear he completely and totally stands by the report.

“Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose those words carefully and the work speaks for itself. And the report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress.”

Robert Mueller

The reaction from Team Trump is probably what you expected:

Click any of these images to read them entirely, if they’re cut off.

From Trump’s 2020 campaign manager, Brad Parscale, put out by its national press secretary:

From the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee:

Mueller speaking was not a surprise to the president. He knew. His people had their ducks in a row. But were they right? Let’s review.

“No collusion and no obstruction.”

Collins

“No collusion — no case for obstruction — fully and completely exonerated.”

Parscale

“There was no collision, no conspiracy — no obstruction.”

Sanders

Really?

Mueller did not say anything even close to those things! Click here for a full transcript of Mueller’s statement.

Now, get your fingers ready to count with me. Don‘t worry if you‘re not good at math. You won‘t need your toes.

The facts are Mueller used the word “conspiracy” once and “conspirators” once. He never said “collusion” at all. There was “obstruct” twice, “obstructs” once, and “obstruction” twice.

He said he knew, whatever he found, he could not charge Trump with a federal crime. (“Charging the president with a crime was therefore [bound by Department of Justice policy] not an option we could consider.”)

Some quotes straight from Mueller you can find in his statement:

On the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia:

“There was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.”

Mueller

On whether Trump tried to interfere in the Russia investigation:

“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.”

Mueller

Note that’s not a ringing endorsement. He couldn’t clear the president. That’s not a yes or a no, but rather in the spirit of test-taking, a skipped question.

And Mr. President, it’s not true that “a person is innocent,” as you tweeted about yourself. For a suspect charged or indicted, and goes to trial, the choices for the judge or jury are guilty or not guilty (as in not proven guilty).

“Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.”

Mueller

“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. … It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.”

Mueller

Does Mueller mean Congress can or should launch impeachment hearings, which are NOT part of the criminal justice system, instead? (Impeachment rules come directly from the Constitution, Article. I., Section. 2. (House) and Section. 3. (Senate), which ends, “the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.” Remember not to hold your breath for any more from Mueller.

“We concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”

Mueller

Is there anybody who still thinks this was a good day for President Trump? Seems to me impeachment hearings are more likely now than they were before Mueller spoke!

Even Fox News published most of these tweets from some Democratic presidential hopefuls:

Remember, I’m just the messenger.

In case you haven’t heard, Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) is running for president.

I could not find anything on the subject from this moment’s front-runner, former senator and vice president Joe Biden, either on Twitter or Facebook.

Impeachment is like indictment. Congress investigates, usually starting with the House Judiciary Committee. Its chairman is Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.).

Then, if it goes beyond the committee, the full House must pass articles of impeachment, which are the formal allegation(s), by a simple majority. If that happens, then the president has been impeached. Bill Clinton (1998) and Andrew Johnson (1868) were impeached. Richard Nixon resigned shortly before his likely impeachment.

After that, there would be a trial in the Senate. In the case of a president, the Chief Justice of the United States (John Roberts, right now) would preside. Conviction would require a two-thirds vote and the result would be removal from office. That didn’t happen with Clinton or Johnson. They were acquitted. What would’ve happened with Nixon is anyone’s guess.

Presidential photo from https://www.whitehouse.gov.

However, at this point and amid growing calls, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has not given the go-ahead to start the impeachment process. That may be for political reasons, such as revving up the president’s base for the 2020 election. It may be to save Democrats from embarrassment, in case an impeachment vote fails. She may not want to be too successful and end up with a President Mike Pence who could potentially serve until Jan., 2029! And with new developments happening, she can always change her mind.

But she hasn’t yet.

After Mueller spoke, Pelosi put out a statement that…

“The Special Counsel’s report revealed that the President’s campaign welcomed Russian interference in the election, and laid out eleven instances of the President’s obstruction of the investigation. The Congress holds sacred its constitutional responsibility to investigate and hold the President accountable for his abuse of power.
“The Congress will continue to investigate and legislate to protect our elections and secure our democracy. The American people must have the truth.”

Pelosi

So it looks like more subpoenas to bring witnesses before Congress, or just the Judiciary Committee, and court battles if they refuse to show up. (A few decisions last week cemented congressional investigative powers.)

Don’t ever forget politics is a dirty game. It always has been, at least in the U.S. Want proof? Historian Michael Beschloss even wrote in American Heritage about calls to impeach President George Washington! (Keep in mind, it was in those people’s lifetimes the former general freed our country from Britain!)

Presidential illustration from https://www.whitehouse.gov.

That all brings me back to the title of this post: Would you want this said about you?

I certainly wouldn’t, but I realize die-hard Trump supporters would agree with the president’s tweet near the top: “There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed!”

I’m sorry, but that’s simply not honest and definitely not good enough for me and my good name.

What do you think? Tell me below.

If you appreciate what you read here, please subscribe with either your email address or WordPress account, and get a notice whenever I publish. Don’t rely on social media with its hacking issues and censoring like this, this and this.

Related Posts

Comments

  3. Rupert Murdoch, whose media empire includes Fox News and the NY Post, predicts a landslide Biden victory over Trump. Murdoch’s publications continue to back Trump, but it’s nice Rupert seems to have a “hands-off” policy. Still, Fox News hosts continue to be the president’s staunchest media allies. https://smartnews.link/w/CUQg

    Reply

Something to add? Disagree? Let us all know!

%d bloggers like this: